- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-591/22: Action brought on 23 September 2022 — Polaroid IP v EUIPO — Klimeck (Representation of a square in a rectangle)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0591
62022TN0591
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.11.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 441/22
(Case T-591/22)
(2022/C 441/30)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Polaroid IP BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Vos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thomas Klimeck (Kevelaer, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of a square in a rectangle) — European Union trade mark No 16 217 267
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2022 in Case R 1646/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—remit the case to the Cancellation Division;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of this Application and order Klimeck to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.