- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-33/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 24 January 2012 — Körös-Vidéki Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Igazgatóság v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0033
62012CN0033
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.4.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 126/4
(Case C-33/12)
2012/C 126/07
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Körös-Vidéki Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Igazgatóság
Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve
Question referred
In the case of use as permanent grassland, do dykes constitute utilised agricultural areas within the meaning of Article 143b(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 although their agricultural use is not the primary one but they are also used for water management and flood prevention purposes?
Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1).
* * *
Language of the case: Hungarian.