I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-395/16)(1)
((European Union trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Windfinder - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Neologism - Insufficiently direct and specific connection with certain goods and services covered by the mark applied for - Power to alter decisions))
(2017/C 283/66)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Windfinder R&L GmbH & Co. KG (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: B. Schneider, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2016 (Case R 1206/2015-5), relating to the application for registration of the word sign Windfinder as an EU trade mark.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 May 2016 (Case R 1206/2015-5) in so far as it refused registration of the word sign Windfinder for the goods and services at issue, with the exception of anemometers in Class 9 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, and of meteorological information, meteorological forecast, meteorological information services and the supply of meteorological information in Class 42 of the Nice Agreement;
2.Upholds the action brought by Windfinder R&L GmbH & Co. KG before that Board of Appeal in accordance with the conditions set out at paragraph 1 of the operative part;
3.Dismisses the remainder of Windfinder R&L’s action;
4.Orders Windfinder R&L and EUIPO to bear their own costs.
* * *
(1) OJ C 343, 19.6.2016.