- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-173/24: Action brought on 27 March 2024 – DI v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0173
62024TN0173
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3180
21.5.2024
(Case T-173/24)
(C/2024/3180)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: DI (represented by: S. Rodríguez Bajón and A. Gómez-Acebo Dennes, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Decision of 30 January 2024 of the President of the European Parliament finding that the applicant had engaged in psychological harassment;
—annul the Decision of 30 January 2024 of the President of the European Parliament imposing a reprimand on the applicant for having engaged in conduct amounting to psychological harassment;
—annul any action related to the above acts;
—order the European Parliament pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging failure to observe the applicant’s rights of defence and the right to sound administration.
2.Second plea in law, alleging failure to comply with procedural deadlines.
3.Third plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging error of assessment.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty of confidentiality and care in the processing of personal data.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3180/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—