I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case F-113/11)
(2012/C 25/134)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s claim for payment of salary arrears for August 2010
The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal should:
—annul the decision issued by — or, in any event, attributable to — the Commission, rejecting — howsoever and whether in whole or in part — the claims set out in the application of 30 August 2010;
—declare that Note Ares (2011)217354 is legally non-existent or, in the alternative, annul that measure (in either case, quatenus opus est);
—annul the decision issued by the Commission rejecting, howsoever, the claims set out in the complaint of 14 March 2011;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.