- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-43/24: Action brought on 26 January 2024 — Penta system v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0043
62024TN0043
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/2168
25.3.2024
(Case T-43/24)
(C/2024/2168)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Penta system Srl (Modugno, Italy) (represented by: K. Duchoňová, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the European Commission of 27 November 2023 on rejection of the applicant’s offer submitted in the tender procedure JRC/IPR/2022/RP/1912 — Radioactive Waste Management Facilities Operations & Maintenance (RAMA) Services and the European Commission’s decision on award of the tender JRC/IPR/2022/RP/1912 — Radioactive Waste Management Facilities Operations & Maintenance (RAMA) Services to [omission of names];
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the applicant relating to the proceeding.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the decision is arbitrary and suffers lack of reasoning.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment.
3.Third plea in law, alleging denial of access to information.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the right to good administration.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2168/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)