I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 111/38)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Suisse) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SK Chemicals GmbH (Eschborn, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a patch) — EU trade mark registration No 11 293 362
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2015 in Case R 2342/2014-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 80(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of the principle of fair trial by the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.