EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-36/13: Action brought on 21 January 2013 — Erreà Sport v OHIM — Facchinelli (ANTONIO BACIONE)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0036

62013TN0036

January 21, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/29

(Case T-36/13)

2013/C 79/50

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Erreà Sport SpA (Torrile, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva and G. Fucci, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antonio Facchinelli (Dalang, China)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 October 2012 in Case R 1561/2011-1 and, consequently, reject the application for registration published in Community Trade Marks Bulletin No 117/2010, lodged by Antonio Facchinelli, in respect of all the goods;

order that the costs incurred by Erreà Sport S.p.A in the present proceedings be reimbursed.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Antonio Facchinelli

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ANTONIO BACIONE’, for goods in Classes 3, 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 9 056 037

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘erreà’ and figurative mark containing two intersecting rhombuses, for goods in Classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 35 and 41

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia