EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-549/12: Action brought on 26 December 2012 — Nemeco/OHIM — Coca-Cola (NU)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0549

62012TN0549

December 26, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/21

(Case T-549/12)

2013/C 63/42

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Nemeco (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Gaspar, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Coca-Cola Company (Atlanta, United States)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision rendered by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Marked (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) on October 16, 2012 (Case No. R 266/2012-2);

Order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay Nemeco’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘NU’, for goods in class 32 — International Registration No 1 033 122 designating the European Union

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 5386081 of the word mark ‘NU YU’, for goods in classes 29, 30 and 32

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia