- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-527/15: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 April 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems, also trading under the name Filmspeler (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Directive 2001/29/EC — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Definition — Sale of a multimedia player — Add-ons — Publication of works without the consent of the right holder — Access to streaming websites — Article 5(1) and (5) — Right of reproduction — Exceptions and limitations — Lawful use)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0527
62015CA0527
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.6.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 195/2
(Case C-527/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual and industrial property - Directive 2001/29/EC - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights - Article 3(1) - Communication to the public - Definition - Sale of a multimedia player - Add-ons - Publication of works without the consent of the right holder - Access to streaming websites - Article 5(1) and (5) - Right of reproduction - Exceptions and limitations - Lawful use))
(2017/C 195/02)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Stichting Brein
Defendant: Jack Frederik Wullems, also trading under the name Filmspeler
Operative part of the judgment
1.The concept of ‘communication to the public’, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, must be interpreted as covering the sale of a multimedia player, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, on which there are pre-installed add-ons, available on the internet, containing hyperlinks to websites — that are freely accessible to the public — on which copyright-protected works have been made available to the public without the consent of the right holders.
2.Article 5(1) and (5) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as meaning that acts of temporary reproduction, on a multimedia player, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, of a copyright-protected work obtained by streaming from a website belonging to a third party offering that work without the consent of the copyright holder does not satisfy the conditions set out in those provisions.
Language of the case: Dutch
*
(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
* * *