- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-662/11: Action brought on 28 December 2011 — Müller v OHIM — Loncar (Sunless)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0662
62011TN0662
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.2.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 49/32
(Case T-662/11)
2012/C 49/58
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Müller (Gütersloh, Germany) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Loncar, SL (Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 September 2011 in Case R 2508/2010-2;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Thomas Müller
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Sunless’, for goods in Classes 6, 19, 22 and 24.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Loncar, SL
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word marks ‘SUNLESS’ and ‘LONCAR-SUNLESS’ for goods in Classes 22, 23 and 24 and ropes, string, nets, tents, awnings, tarpaulins, sails, sacks and bags (not included in other classes); padding and stuffing materials (except of rubber or plastics); raw fibrous textile materials.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.