- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-139/16: Action brought on 31 March 2016 — SDSR v EUIPO — Berghaus (BERG OUTDOOR)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0139
62016TN0139
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.5.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 175/33
(Case T-139/16)
(2016/C 175/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Sports Division SR, SA (SDSR) (Matosinhos, Portugal) (represented by: A. Sebastião and J. Pimenta, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Berghaus Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BERG OUTDOOR’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 116 936
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2016 in Case R 153/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to grant the registration of International trademark no. 1116936 designating the EU in its entirety;
—order the intervener to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.