EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-5/16: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2018 — Republic of Poland v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Decision (EU) 2015/1814 — Determination of legal basis — No taking into account of the effects of a measure — Article 192(1) TFEU — Article 192(2)(c) TFEU — Measures significantly affecting a Member State’s choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply — Principle of sincere cooperation — Article 15 TEU — Powers of the European Council — Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of proportionality — Impact assessment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0005

62016CA0005

June 21, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C-5/16) (*1)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and K. Rudzińska, acting as Agents, and by I. Tatarewicz, ekspert)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: A. Tamás and A. Pospíšilová Padowska, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm, A. Sikora, and K. Pleśniak, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: M. Wolff, J. Nymann-Lindegren and C. Thorning, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis and M. A. Sampol Pucurull, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: D. Colas, G. de Bergues, J. Traband, T. Deleuil and S. Ghiandoni, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, U. Persson, N. Otte Widgren and L. Swedenborg, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, A. C. Becker, E. White and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union;

3.Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

*

(*1) OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia