I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Appeal - Plant protection products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 - Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 - Action for annulment)
(C/2024/7012)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: UPL Europe Ltd, Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV (represented by: C. Mereu, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes and M. ter Haar, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 February 2023, UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission (T-742/20, EU:T:2023:74), in so far as it found that the European Commission could rely, in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 of 14 December 2020 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, on the opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency on the classification of mancozeb as a toxic substance for reproduction category 1B;
2.Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;
3.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union in order for it to rule on the fourth plea in law relied on before it;
4.Reserves the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7012/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—