- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-368/17: Action brought on 9 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0368
62017TN0368
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 249/45
(Case T-368/17)
(2017/C 249/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Linak A/S (Nordborg, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design ‘Electrically operated lifting column’ — Community design No 101 159-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 in Case R 1412/2015-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the Applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.