- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-215/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — E. Friz GmbH v Carsten von der Heyden (Consumer protection — Contracts negotiated away from business premises — Scope of Directive 85/577/EEC — Entry into a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership — Cancellation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007CA0148
62007CA0148
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/5
(Case C-215/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Consumer protection - Contracts negotiated away from business premises - Scope of Directive 85/577/EEC - Entry into a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership - Cancellation)
2010/C 148/07
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: E. Friz GmbH
Defendant: Carsten von der Heyden
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 1(1) and 5(2) of Council Directive 85/577/EEC of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises (OJ 1985 L 372, p. 31) — Scope — Consumer joining a closed-end real property fund in the form of a partnership whose essential purpose is the investment of capital — Legal effects of cancellation.
Operative part of the judgment
1.Council Directive 85/577/EEC of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises applies to a contract, concluded in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, concerning a consumer’s entry to a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership when the principal purpose of joining is not to become a member of that partnership, but is a means of capital investment;
2.Article 5(2) of the Directive does not preclude, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, a national law according to which, in the event of cancellation of membership of a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership, entered into following a doorstep transaction, the consumer has a claim against that partnership, to his severance balance, calculated on the basis of the value of his interest at the date of his retirement from membership of that fund, and may therefore get back less than the value of his capital contribution or have to participate in the losses of that fund.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.