I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2019/C 122/28)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag (Saltsjö-Boo, Sweden) (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund, V. Dalichau and B. Breitinger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen GmbH (Ichenhausen, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design No 1 289 243-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2018 in Case R 1455/2018-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—alternatively, amend the contested decision and rule that the appeal is justified;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court.
—Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.