- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-48/24, Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 25 January 2024 – VšĮ Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla v Valstybinė kalbos inspekcija
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0048
62024CN0048
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/2593
22.4.2024
(Case C-48/24, Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla)
(C/2024/2593)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant at first instance and appellant: VšĮ Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla
Defendant at first instance and respondent: Valstybinė kalbos inspekcija
Questions referred
1.Is Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that it includes within its scope the requirement, laid down by national law, for proficiency in the State language which applies to the administrative staff and teachers of an educational establishment founded by a private natural person, which establishment implements an international secondary education programme and international baccalaureate programmes for primary years and middle years?
2.If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the requirement for proficiency in the State language applies without exception, first, to all teachers working in an educational establishment founded by a private natural person delivering an international secondary education programme and international baccalaureate primary years and middle years programmes, and, second, to the administrative staff of such educational establishment, irrespective of any circumstances specific to the activities of the educational establishment concerned?
3.Is Article 53 of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications to be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the requirement for proficiency in the State language applies, without exception, to all teachers working in an educational establishment founded by a private natural person and delivering an international secondary education programme and international baccalaureate primary years and middle years programmes, irrespective of any circumstances specific to the activities of the educational establishment concerned?
Language of the case: Lithuanian
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2593/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—