I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
—
(2016/C 078/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: SeNaPro GmbH (Pommelsbrunn, Germany) (represented by: A. Schröder, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke GmbH (Rottenmann, Austria)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Dolokorn’ — Application No 11 877 181
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2015 in Case R 2643/2014-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay its own costs and those incurred by SeNaPro GmbH.
—Infringement of Article 75 and Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—
—