- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-563/19: Action brought on 14 August 2019 – Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT Bar)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0563
62019TN0563
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.10.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 337/19
—
(Case T-563/19)
(2019/C 337/19)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F. Miazzetto, J. Gracia Albero, R. Seoane Lacayo and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark PERFECT Bar – Application for registration No 15 376 064
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2019 in Case R 372/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs derived from the procedure before the General Court and EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
—Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—