I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-724/14)(*1)
((Action for annulment - Arbitration clause - Action programme ‘Lifelong Learning (2007-2013)’ - ‘Brand & Merchandising manager for SMEs in the childrens’ product sector’ project - Pre-information letter - Debit note - Identification of the defendant - Partial inadmissibility))
(2015/C 320/44)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: European Children’s Fashion Association (Valencia, Spain); and Instituto de Economía Pública, SL (Valencia) (represented by: A. Haegeman, lawyer)
Defendants: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents) and ‘Education, Audiovisual and Culture’ Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet and A. Jaume, acting as Agents)
Primarily, application, pursuant to Article 272 TFEU, seeking to have declared as unfounded EACEA’s request for recovery of grants paid to the first applicant under the agreement for the execution of the ‘Brand & Merchandising Manager for SMEs in the Children’s Product Sector’ project, or, in the alternative, application for annulment, first, of EACEA’s pre-information letter of 1 August 2014 informing the first applicant that it had to reimburse the sum of EUR 82 378,81 following the audit of that project and, second, of debit note No 3241401420, issued by EACEA on 5 August 2014, seeking the reimbursement of that sum.
1)The action is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it relates to the European Commission.
2)European Children’s Fashion Association and Instituto de Economía Pública, SL are ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
(*1) OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.