- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases T-162/11 and T-163/11: Order of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — Cofra v OHIM — O2 (can do) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0162
62011TB0162
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/32
(Joined Cases T-162/11 and T-163/11)
((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 112/42
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Cofra Holding (Zug, Switzerland) (represented initially by: K.-U. Jonas and J. Bogatz, and subsequently by M. Viefhues, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: K. Klüpfel, and subsequently by A. Schifko, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: O2 Holdings Ltd (Slough, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Müller and F. Fottner, lawyers)
Re:
Two actions brought against two decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2011 (Cases R 242/2009-4 and R 246/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between ALDEMA AG and O2 Holdings Ltd, on the one hand, and between C&A Mode KG and O2 Holdings Ltd, on the other.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the actions.
2.The applicant and the intervener are ordered to pay their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.
*
Language of the case: German.
* * *