I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(2)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Decision 2010/279/CFSP - European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan - Article 7(3) - Costs related to seconded staff - Allowances paid by both the European Union and the Member State to which the member of staff belongs - Concurrent - Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU - First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU - Jurisdiction of the Court to interpret a provision of EU law concerning the CFSP)
(C/2025/2833)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: NR
Defendants: Ministero della Difesa, Comando Generale dell’Arma dei Carabinieri, Comando Generale Carabinieri – Centro Nazionale Amministrativo – Chieti, Centro Amministrativo d’Intendenza Interforze del Contingente delle Forze Armate Italiane in Afghanistan, Centro Nazionale Amministrativo dell’Arma dei Carabinieri
Article 7(3) of Council Decision 2010/279/CFSP of 18 May 2010 on the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN)
must be interpreted as not providing for the applicable per diems as well as hardship and risk allowances, paid by the European Union to a member of staff of the police mission extended by that decision, to be received concurrently with allowances of the same kind paid to that member of staff in respect of the performance of the same duties with that police mission by the Member State of that member of staff.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/4078.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2833/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—