- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-227/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 16 May 2011 — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0227
62011CN0227
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.7.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 226/12
(Case C-227/11)
2011/C 226/23
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV
Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat
Questions referred
1.Must the active network analysers [of the type J6801B] be classified under heading 9030 40 or under heading 9031 80?
2.Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 129/2005 (1) of 20 January 2005 … invalid because in that regulation the Commission incorrectly classified the network analysers mentioned in points 3 and 4, namely, under CN code 9031 80 39, instead of under code 9030 40?
Concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature and amending Regulation (EC) No 955/98 (OJ 2005 L 25, p. 37).
Language of the case: Dutch
* * *