- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-621/22: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2023 — SB v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Rotation exercise — Rejection of application — Article 98(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Manifest error of assessment — Legitimate expectation — Equal treatment — Misuse of power — Responsibility — Material and non-material damage)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0621
62022TA0621
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1415
19.2.2024
(Case T-621/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - EEAS staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rotation exercise - Rejection of application - Article 98(1) of the Staff Regulations - Article 2(e) of the CEOS - Manifest error of assessment - Legitimate expectation - Equal treatment - Misuse of power - Responsibility - Material and non-material damage)
(C/2024/1415)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: SB (represented by: L. Burguin, T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Falek, A. Ireland and R. Coesme, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation in respect of the material and non-material damage that she suffered on account of, first, the decisions of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (‘the AECC’) of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 10 November 2021 by which it rejected her application for the positions of [confidential], as confirmed and supplemented by letter of the AECC of 1 February 2022 and, secondly, the EEAS’s alleged misconduct related to those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders SB to pay the costs.
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1415/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)