I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Goods subject to excise duties under national legislation - Non-alcoholic beverages - Unlawful detention and introduction into the territory of a Member State of goods coming from other Member States - Penalties - Article 42 - Article 6(3) TEU - Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Obligation to pay a sum corresponding to the value of the missing goods - Duplication with a criminal fine - Absence of mitigation powers of the court - Proportionality - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
(C/2025/2176)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Minister van Financiën
Defendants: DRINKS 52 BVBA, NZ
Intervener: Openbaar Ministerie
The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, Afdeling Gent (East Flanders Court of First Instance, Ghent Division, Belgium), by decision of 15 December 2023 (Case C-800/23).
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/2915.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2176/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—