EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-6/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2008 — Galderma v OHIM — Lelas (Nanolat) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Nanolat — Earlier national word mark TANNOLACT — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0006

62007TA0006

January 1, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

10.1.2009

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/24

(Case T-6/07)(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Nanolat - Earlier national word mark TANNOLACT - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 6/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Galderma SA (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Tihomir Lelas (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: H.-J. Omsels, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2006 (Case R 146/2006-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Galderma SA and Mr Tihomir Lelas

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.dismisses the action;

2.orders Galderma SA to pay the costs.

* * *

(1) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia