I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-6/07)(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Nanolat - Earlier national word mark TANNOLACT - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2009/C 6/49)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Galderma SA (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Tihomir Lelas (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: H.-J. Omsels, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2006 (Case R 146/2006-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Galderma SA and Mr Tihomir Lelas
The Court:
1.dismisses the action;
2.orders Galderma SA to pay the costs.
* * *
(1) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.