I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language of the case: German
Applicant: LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH
Defendant: Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH
1.Is the term ‘intermediary’ in Article 5(1)(a) and Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society to be interpreted as including an access provider who merely provides a user with access to the network by allocating him a dynamic IP address but does not himself provide him with any services such as e-mail, FTP or file-sharing services and does not exercise any control, either in law or in fact, over the services which the user makes use of?
2.If the first question is answered in the affirmative: Is Article 8(3) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, having regard to Article 6 and Article 15 of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, to be interpreted (restrictively) as not permitting the disclosure of personal traffic data to private third parties for the purpose of civil proceedings for alleged infringements of exclusive rights protected by copyright (rights of exploitation and use)?
(1) OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.
(2) OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45.