- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-390/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 2 October 2009 — Reti Televisive Italiane SpA (RTI) v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Communicazioni
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0390
62009CN0390
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.12.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 312/20
(Case C-390/09)
2009/C 312/32
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Reti Televisive Italiane SpA. (RTI)
Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Communicazioni
Questions referred
1.Are Articles 18 and 18a of Directive 89/552/EEC, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, to be regarded as being sufficiently precise and unconditional as to be capable, after the period for transposition has expired, of taking precedence over conflicting provisions of domestic law, of supplementing, on a correct interpretation of the third paragraph of Article 249 EC, the relevant national provisions, and of being implemented by an administrative authority, such as AGCOM, which is invested with the power to implement regulations under national law?
2.Are Articles 18 and 18a of Directive 89/552/EEC, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, to be interpreted as meaning that, in view of the mandatory minimum duration of 15 minutes applicable to teleshopping windows, any other form of teleshopping, including windows lasting more than 3 minutes but less than 15 minutes, must be classified as a “teleshopping spot” subject to the hourly limits applicable to advertising spots?
3.Are Articles 1(c), 10, 11 and 18(3) of Directive 89/552/EEC, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, to be interpreted as meaning that announcements made by a broadcaster in connection with its own programmes and broadcast free of charge are to be regarded as advertising for the purposes of the rules governing the way in which messages are distinguished from the rest of the programme and advertising inserted in television broadcasts?
4.Are Articles 1(c), 10, 11 and 18(3) of Directive 89/552/EEC, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, to be interpreted as meaning that the institutional information and communication activities referred to in Italian Law No 150 of 7 June 2000, including messages of social value and messages of public interest, are to be regarded as advertising for the purposes of the rules governing the way in which advertising messages are distinguished from the rest of the programme and advertising inserted in television broadcasts?
(1) OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23.
(2) OJ 1997 L 265, p. 42.