- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-758/22: Action brought on 5 December 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce (Shoes)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0758
62022TN0758
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/77
(Case T-758/22)
(2023/C 35/97)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co. Ltd (Quanzhou, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 8 367 742-0013
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2022 in Case R 1876/2021-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 6(1)(a) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.