14.9.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/5

—

(Case C-202/20 P)

(2020/C 304/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Claudio Necci (represented by: S. Orlandi, T. Martin, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

—set aside the order of 25 March 2020 of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-129/19, Necci v Commission;

—refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to be adjudged afresh;

—reserve the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appellant seeks to have aside the order of 25 May 2020 in Case T-129/19, by which the General Court of the European Union dismissed his action for annulment as inadmissible and ordered him to pay the costs.

The appellant raises three grounds of appeal in that regard:

The first ground alleges a distortion of the subject matter of the dispute in so far as the General Court of the European Union took the view that the decision of 18 July 2011 adversely affected the appellant.

The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of his right to effective legal protection in so far as, if his appeal is inadmissible, the applicant will have no remedy to challenge the fact that he no longer enjoys any social protection, despite the fact that he has worked for his whole life.

The third ground of appeal alleges infringement of the principle of single applicable legislation in so far as the General Court of the European Union held that the loss of all social protection in Italy following the transfer ‘follows from the legal norms specific to the national law at issue and … has no bearing whatsoever on his situation in respect of the JSIS’.

—