- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-741/18 P: Order of the Court of 19 December 2019 — OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskemeldi Ktf. (OPS Újpest Kft.) v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Deadline for lodging an appeal — Starting point — Awareness of the existence of the contested measure — Request for translation of the contested measure — Reasonable time — Out of time — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Assessment of the facts — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CB0741
62018CB0741
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 68/22
(Case C-741/18 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State Aid - Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers - Action for annulment - Alleged decisions not to raise objections - Deadline for lodging an appeal - Starting point - Awareness of the existence of the contested measure - Request for translation of the contested measure - Reasonable time - Out of time - Inadmissibility of the action at first instance - Assessment of the facts - Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
(2020/C 68/21)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Appellant: OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskemeldi Ktf. (OPS Újpest Kft.) (represented by: L. Szabó, űgyvéd)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020068EN.01002201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020068EN.01002201-E0001">*1</a> </span>) <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2019:112:TOC">OJ C 112, 25.3.2019</a>.