I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 390/56)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernandez Ruperez, J. King, agents, H. Kamann, M. Braun and F. Louis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
By its application, the SRB seeks the annulment of the decision of the EDPS of 24 June 2020 under its complaint references 2019-0947, 2019-0998, 2019-0999, 2019-1000 and 2019-1122, which held that the SRB infringed Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (1).
In support of its action, the SRB relies on two pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging that the information shared with the third party was not ‘personal data’ within the wording and purpose of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Second plea in law, alleging that the EDPS infringed the right to a good administration pursuant to Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by not revealing sufficient information on the complaints.
* Language of the case: English.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).