I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
9.12.2024
(Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB - Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution - Representation of a party - Authority to act granted to the lawyer - Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/7172)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, G. Marafioti and M. Puidokas, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage which it allegedly suffered as a result, on the one hand, of the adoption of Decision ECB-SSM-2018-MT-4 WHD-2018-0014 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 2 November 2018 withdrawing its authorisation as a credit institution and, on the other hand, of the ECB’s conduct in connection with that decision.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Pilatus Bank plc is ordered to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7172/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—