I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 88/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Liu Yajun (Shenzhen, China)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark PREMILITY — Application for registration No 17 899 016
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 November 2020 in Case R 881/2020-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, in so far as, by dismissing the opponent’s appeal, the Board thereby confirms the Opposition Division’s decision in opposition proceedings B 3 065 346 granting EU trade mark No 17 899 016 PREMILITY (figurative) for the goods in Classes 11, 21, 22 and 28 for which registration was sought;
—order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 47(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of the case-law established in the judgment of 11 March 2003, C-40/01, Ansul, EU:C:2003:145.
—Inconsistency of the decision with and, therefore, infringement of, the case-law established in the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 June 2020 in Case C-115/19 P, China Construction Bank v EUIPO (C-115/19 P, EU:C:2020:469) and in the judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020, Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO — MasterCard International (We IntelliGence the World and Others) (T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T - 98/19, EU:T:2020:231).