EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-326/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission (Dumping — Import of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 — Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Definition of the product concerned — Determination of the normal value — Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Report establishing significant distortions in the exporting country — Burden of proof — Reference to a representative country — Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Injury — Economic factors and incices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0326

62021TA0326

June 21, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.8.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/20

(Case T-326/21) (*)

(Dumping - Import of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 - Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Definition of the product concerned - Determination of the normal value - Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Report establishing significant distortions in the exporting country - Burden of proof - Reference to a representative country - Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Injury - Economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry - Rights of the defence - Principle of good administration)

(2023/C 278/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd (Qingyuan, China), Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd (Yuan Tan Town, China) (represented by: M. Maresca, C. Malinconico, D. Guardamagna, M. Guardamagna, D. Maresca, A. Cerruti, A. Malinconico and G. Falla, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, P. Němečková and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Neergaard, M. Peternel and L. Stefani, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action the applicants seek, first, under Article 263 TFEU, the annulment, principally, of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 of 29 March 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2021 L 109, p. 1), in so far as it concerns them and, in the alternative, of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21), and, second, under Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the harm it claims to have suffered as a result of the application of the contested regulation and the basic regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the application;

2.Orders Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

3.Declares that the European Parliament and Airoldi Metalli SpA are to bear their own costs.

(*)

Language of the case: Italian

OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia