EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 March 1990. # Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht München - Germany. # Common Customs Tariff - Ear-piercing instruments and stud earrings. # Case C-344/88.

ECLI:EU:C:1990:147

61988CJ0344

March 28, 1990
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61988J0344

European Court reports 1990 Page I-01505 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

Keywords

++++

Common Customs Tariff - Tariff headings - Classification of decorative stud earrings and ear-piercing instruments

Summary

Stud earrings, whether or not put up in sterile packaging, made of gold - or silver-plated steel, consisting of a shank with a decorative head and a "butterfly" fastening, this shank being used to pierce the ear by means of a special device, which secures it in the ear lobe, came within subheading 71.16 A of the Common Customs Tariff even before the entry into force of Commission Regulation No 3558/81 which expressly classified them under that subheading.

Subheading 84.59 E II must be interpreted as including ear-piercing instruments.

Parties

In Case C-344/88

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Finanzgericht Muenchen ( Finance Court, Munich ), Federal Republic of Germany, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

SA Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co . KG

Hauptzollamt Nuernberg-Fuerth ( Principal Customs Office, Nuremberg-Fuerth ),

on the interpretation of tariff subheading 84.59 E ( machines and mechanical appliances ), Heading 82.04 ( other hand tools ), Heading 90.17 ( medical instruments and appliances ), and tariff subheadings 71.16 A ( imitation jewellery ) and 73.31 B ( nails, tacks, spiked cramps ) in the Annex to Council Regulation No 3000/79 of 30 December 1979 amending Regulation No 2800/78 amending Regulation No 950/68 on the Common Customs Tariff ( Official Journal 1979, L 342, p . 1 ),

THE COURT ( First Chamber )

composed of : Sir Gordon Slynn, President of Chamber, R . Joliet and G . C . Rodríguez Iglesias, Judges,

( the grounds of the judgment are not reproduced )

in answer to the questions referred to it by the Finanzgericht Muenchen, by order of 27 June 1988, rules as follows :

Operative part

( 1 ) Subheading 71.16 A of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as including, even before the entry into force of Commission Regulation No 3558/81 of 8 December 1981 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 76.16 A of the Common Customs Tariff, stud earrings of the kind referred to in that regulation.

( 2 ) Subheading 84.59 E II of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as including ear-piercing instruments.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia