I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 78/27
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter, M. Kefferpütz and A. Marx, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Horno del Espinar, SL (El Espinar, Spain)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 October 2013 given in Case R 2338/2012-2;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Castello’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 et 31 — Community trade mark application No 6 819 941
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 4 199 907 for goods and services in Classes 30, 35 and 39 and Spanish trade marks for goods and services in Classes 30, 35 and 39
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 75, 79 and 8(1)(b) CTMR.