I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 78/29
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Sales & Solutions GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: K. Gründig-Schnelle, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wattline GmbH (Ruderting, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Alter the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2013 in Case R 1668/2012-4 to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the application for the Community trade mark is rejected;
—Order the intervener to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Wattline GmbH
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘WATTLINE’ for services in Classes 35, 36 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 8 908 345
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word and figurative mark and the Community word and figurative mark ‘Watt’ for services in Classes 35, 39 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the contested decision was annulled and the opposition was rejected
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and infringement of Rule 20(7)(c) and Rule 50 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95