- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-143/15: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — G.E. Security BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Classification of goods — Headings 8517, 8521, 8531 and 8543 — Product known as a ‘video multiplexer’)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0143
62015CA0143
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 145/12
(Case C-143/15) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Classification of goods - Headings 8517, 8521, 8531 and 8543 - Product known as a ‘video multiplexer’))
(2016/C 145/14)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: G.E. Security BV
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Operative part of the judgment
The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007, must be interpreted as meaning that a product such as the ‘video multiplexer’ at issue in the main proceedings must, subject to the referring court’s assessment of all the facts before it, be classified in heading 8521 of that nomenclature.
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.