EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-181/21 and C-269/21, G. and Others (Appointment of common law judges in Poland): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach and Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie — Poland) — G. (C-181/21), BC, DC (C-269/21) v M.S. (C-181/21), X (C-269/21) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court — Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment — Independence of the judiciary — Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts — Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on a request for the grant of preventative measures — Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court — Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0181

62021CA0181

January 9, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1498

(Joined Cases C-181/21 and C-269/21, (1) G. and Others (Appointment of common law judges in Poland)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court - Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment - Independence of the judiciary - Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts - Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on a request for the grant of preventative measures - Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court - Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling)

(C/2024/1498)

Language of the case: Polish

Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach, Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: G. (C-181/21), BC, DC (C-269/21)

Defendants: M.S. (C-181/21), X (C-269/21)

Intervener: Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich, Prokuratura Okręgowa w Katowicach, Prokuratura Okręgowa w Krakowie

Operative part of the judgment

The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach (Regional Court, Katowice, Poland), by decision of 18 March 2021, and by the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie (Regional Court, Kraków, Poland), by decision of 31 March 2021, are inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1498/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia