- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-348/21: Action brought on 22 June 2021 — Volkskreditbank v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0348
62021TN0348
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.8.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/51
(Case T-348/21)
(2021/C 320/57)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Volkskreditbank AG (Linz, Austria) (represented by G. Eisenberger and A. Brenneis, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the ex-ante contributions to the single resolution fund for 2021 (ref: SRB/ESF/2021/22), including the annexes thereto, in any event in so far as that Decision, including the annexes thereto, concerns the contribution to be paid by the applicant;
—stay the present proceedings under Article 69(c) and (d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court until final settlement of (joined) cases C-584/20 P (1) and C-621/20 P, (2) C-663/20 P (3) and C-664/20 P, (4) as the legal questions are largely the same in those pending appeals;
—order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law, which are identical to the pleas in law put forward in Case T-347/21, Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB.
(1)
OJ 2020 C 423, p. 32.
(2)
OJ 2020 C 443, p. 17.
(3)
OJ 2021 C 44, p. 33.
(4)
OJ 2021 C 44, p. 35.