- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-827/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kamenz — Germany) — MC v ND (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Lugano II Convention — Article 22(1) — Proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property — Restitution of the proceeds from the rental of a property before the transfer of ownership)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CB0827
62018CB0827
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.8.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 288/9
(Case C-827/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Lugano II Convention - Article 22(1) - Proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property - Restitution of the proceeds from the rental of a property before the transfer of ownership)
(2019/C 288/10)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: MC
Defendant: ND
Operative part of the order
Article 22(1), first subparagraph, of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed on 30 October 2007, the conclusion of which was approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2009/430/EC of 27 November 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that proceedings brought by the purchaser of immovable property, seeking the payment of a sum received by the vendor in respect of rent paid by a third party, where that purchaser, although he had taken possession of that property at the time of the payment of that sum, was not yet the owner in law of that property, in accordance with the applicable national legislation, do not constitute proceedings ‘which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property’ within the meaning of that provision.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.