- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-116/16: Order of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Corporate tax — Aid in favour of Belgian ports granted by Belgium — Commission letter proposing the adoption of appropriate measures — Measure not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0116
62016TB0116
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 14/35
(Case T-116/16) (*)
((Action for annulment - State aid - Corporate tax - Aid in favour of Belgian ports granted by Belgium - Commission letter proposing the adoption of appropriate measures - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 014/43)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL (La Louvière, Belgium), Port autonome de Namur (Namur, Belgiun), Port autonome de Charleroi (Charleroi, Belgium), Port autonome de Liège (Liège, Belgium), Région wallonne (Belgium) (represented by: J. Vanden Eynde, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action based on Article 263 TFEU, requesting annulment of the alleged decision concerning State aid SA.38393 (2015/E) — Taxation of ports in Belgium, annexed to the Commission’s letter of 22 January 2016 seeking to propose appropriate measures to the Kingdom of Belgium.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.The Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL, the Port autonome de Namur, the Port autonome de Charleroi, the Port autonome de Liège and the Région wallonne shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.
(*) Language of the case: French.
* * *
(1) OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.