- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-83/12: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0083
62012TB0083
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 273/10
(Case T-83/12)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 273/17
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc. (Fort Myers, United States) (represented by: T. Holman, solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Artsana SpA (Grandate, Italy)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2011 (Case R 2084/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Artsana SpA and Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party is to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.