- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-64/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Mainova v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Definition of the market — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of diligence — Misuse of powers)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0064
62021TA0064
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1688
(Case T-64/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity and gas markets - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Concept of ‘single concentration’ - Definition of the market - Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition - Manifest errors of assessment - Duty of diligence - Misuse of powers)
(C/2024/1688)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mainova AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Schalast, H. Löschan and Y. Salamati, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and C. Zois, acting as Agents, and F. Haus, L. Rundel and F. Schmidt, lawyers)
Interveners in support of the defendant: E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Ziebarth and J. Siegmund, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 6530 final of 17 September 2019 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8870 — E.ON/Innogy).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mainova AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG.
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1688/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)