EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-517/11: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2012 — United States Polo Association v OHIM — Polo/Lauren (Representation of two polo players) (Community trade mark — Partial refusal of registration — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0517

62011TB0517

July 17, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.9.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/31

(Case T-517/11)(1)

(Community trade mark - Partial refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 287/58

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: United States Polo Association (Lexington, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr and T. Melchert, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: The Polo/Lauren Company, LP (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Granado Carpenter and M. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 June 2011 (Case R 1170/2010-2), concerning opposition proceedings between United States Polo Association and The Polo/Lauren Company, LP.

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the defendant and the intervener.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia