I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-202/13)(1)
((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Professional association - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
2014/C 315/85
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Group’Hygiène (Paris, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)
Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sphère France SAS and of Schweitzer SAS.
3.Group’Hygiène is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(1)
OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.