- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-603/21: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2022 — WO v European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Civil service — Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Candidates nominated by [confidential] — Refusal by the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to appoint the applicant — No dispute between the Union and one of its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations and the CEOS — Article 270 TFEU — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0603(01)
62021TB0603(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.1.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 15/41
(Case T-603/21) (*)
(Civil service - Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Candidates nominated by [confidential] - Refusal by the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to appoint the applicant - No dispute between the Union and one of its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations and the CEOS - Article 270 TFEU - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(2023/C 15/54)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WO (represented by V. Vitkovskis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by L. De Matteis and J. Castillo García, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision No 28/2021 of the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 21 April 2021 rejecting a candidate for the position of European Delegated Prosecutor of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in [confidential].
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.WO shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.
(*)
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140
Official Journal of the European Union C 513, 20.12.2021.