EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-554/23 P and C-568/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025 – Fertilizers Europe and Commission v Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK Azot (Appeal – Dumping – Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Request for an expiry review of anti-dumping measures – Time limit laid down in that provision for making such a request – Sufficiency of the evidence – Information submitted after the expiry of that time limit)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0554

62023CA0554

April 30, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3244

24.6.2025

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025 – Fertilizers Europe and Commission v Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’

(Joined Cases C-554/23 P

and C-568/23 P)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Request for an expiry review of anti-dumping measures - Time limit laid down in that provision for making such a request - Sufficiency of the evidence - Information submitted after the expiry of that time limit)

(C/2025/3244)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Fertilizers Europe (C-554/23 P) (represented by: J. Beck, advocaat, and L. Ruessmann, avocat), European Commission (C-568/23 P) (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot, AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ (represented by: A. de Moncuit, E. Gergondet, N. Mizulin, A. Nosowicz, avocats, and P. Vander Schueren, advocaat), European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents), Fertilizers Europe (represented by: J. Beck, advocaat, and L. Ruessmann, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 5 July 2023, Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission (T-126/21, EU:T:2023:376);

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

Reserves the costs.

(1) OJ C C/2023/209.

(2) OJ C C/2023/960.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3244/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia