I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Request for an expiry review of anti-dumping measures - Time limit laid down in that provision for making such a request - Sufficiency of the evidence - Information submitted after the expiry of that time limit)
(C/2025/3244)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: Fertilizers Europe (C-554/23 P) (represented by: J. Beck, advocaat, and L. Ruessmann, avocat), European Commission (C-568/23 P) (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot, AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ (represented by: A. de Moncuit, E. Gergondet, N. Mizulin, A. Nosowicz, avocats, and P. Vander Schueren, advocaat), European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents), Fertilizers Europe (represented by: J. Beck, advocaat, and L. Ruessmann, avocat)
The Court:
Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 5 July 2023, Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission (T-126/21, EU:T:2023:376);
Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
Reserves the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2023/209.
(2) OJ C C/2023/960.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3244/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—